Today I was watching the Olympics on my NEW SOFA (wonderful, thanks for asking, like sitting in beige suede clouds). Anyway, the men’s downhill skiing was on- you know, flailing wildly around poles as flexible as my sexually adventurous friend- anyway, the commentator, clearly a little randy, remarked that one of the skiers was ‘on scintillating form’.
‘Scintillating.’
The only thing remotely scintillating about downhill skiing/ers are the rather fetching lycra outfits. I can think of many scintillating things (sultry Cypriot gentlemen, for example, or the Young Liberals) and even many scintillating things about the winter Olympics (the women’s risqué ice skating outfits, adorably cheesy snowboarders.) The ‘form’ of a lycra clad skier barrelling between flimsy poles is not on my top twenty of either list.
Furthermore, since when could form be described as scintillating? Perhaps when referring to a sex worker, yes- or a Victoria’s Secret model (I’m not above being scintillated by Alessandra, myself). But regarding the form of an athlete, and particularly in the sport so decidedly unsexy as skiing- sorry, Alyssa Camplin, you too- ‘scintillating’ has never been my adjective of choice.
Until now! I resolve to henceforth apply this excellent word whenever form causes my nether regions tingle and on a few select occasions when they don’t. And that is what the men’s downhill skiing commentary has brought to my life.
Maybe the commentator was on crack, maybe he really does get a hard-on watching skiing. I’ll never know. I do know that I’m always up for a bit of homoeroticism in the commentary. ‘Homoeroticism’ is my favourite ‘homo’, above ‘homogenised’, or ‘hommos’.


